• 藍色版面
  • 綠色版面
  • 橘色版面
  • 粉紅色版面
  • 棕色版面
帳號:guest(120.119.126.29)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

本論文引用網址:     
研究生: 阮平明
研究生(外文): Nguyen Binh Minh
論文名稱: Factors that influence on orienting belief of students assignment
論文名稱(外文): Factors that influence on orienting belief of students assignment
指導教授: Jia Rong Wen
指導教授(外文): Jia Rong Wen
學位類別: 碩士
校院名稱: 樹德科技大學
系所名稱: 資訊管理系碩士班
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 66
中文關鍵詞: Factorsbelief of students assignment
外文關鍵詞: Factorsbelief of students assignment
相關次數:
  • 被引用:0
  • 點閱:2
  • 評分:*****
  • 下載:0
  • 書目收藏:0
For each person, belief is always the motivation to work, to learn and to live. Having a belief, people will work study hard, effective and will have a specific objectives to work hard for. On the other way, losing a belief will affect their lives, which causes the disorientation.
Students are elite force among the youth, who will become the country''s young intellectuals in the near future. Therefore, building belief of students is very important in order to grow a country’s future intellectual force.
Vietnamese students are being affected by many factors relating to family, school, economic and social situation, information from public means, Youth Union and Vietnamese Student Association. These factors play an important role in students’ daily life directly and often.
At this moment, there is still limitation in the training and guiding activities in order to build and strengthen the students’ belief. All of the solutions are given only after we have discovered something wrong related to the students’ belief. So, they are not effective, passive and especially not long term and systematic.
The proposal has made a research to find out the impact of the following factors: family, school, economic and social situation, information from public means, Youth Union and Vietnamese Student Association... to the Vietnamese students’ belief. Then, it proposes some solutions and suggestions to promote the good impact of these factors in educating and guiding the belief to the students. It also points out the further way to research about the belief of the students.


Abstract  i
Acknowledgments  iii
Table of Contents  iv
List of Tables  vi
List of Figures  vii
Chapter 1 Introduction  1
1.1. Importance of the study  1
1.2. Background of the study  3
1.3. Purpose of the study  7
1.4. Limitation  7
1.5. Assumptions  8
1.6. Terminology  8
1.6.1. The concept of beliefs  9
1.6.2. The concepts of youths and students  11
1.6.3. Orienting belief  11
1.6.4. Ho Chi Minh Communist Youth Union  12
1.6.5. Vietnam Student Association  13
Chapter 2 Literature Review  14
2.1. Number of Universities, Colleges  14
2.2. The number of students in the training system  16
2.3. Social structure of students  18
2.4. Current status of students’ belief  19
2.5. Factors affect student  21
2.6. Information Systems Success Model  28
Chapter 3 Research Method  32
3.1. Research Framework  32
3.2. Research Hypotheses  32
3.3. Variable Definitions and Measures  34
3.3.1. Students'' beliefs  34
3.3.2. Economic situation - social  36
3.3.3. The mass media  37
3.3.4. The role of family  38
3.3.5. Schools and Youth, Students'' Association  38
3.4. Subjects  41
3.5. Research process  43
3.6. Tool development  43
3.6.1. Questionaire  43
3.6.2. Pilot test  44
3.6.3. ANOVA  44
3.6.4. T-Test  45
Chapter 4 Results of the study  46
4.1. Sample Description  47
4.2. Analysis of variable reliability  48
4.2.1. Factor Analysis  48
4.2.2. Analysis of the reliability of the variables  50
4.3. The level of assessment of variables  53
4.4. Testing hypotheses  54
Chapter 5 Research Conclusion  56
5.1. Evaluation of the orientation of the students’ belief  56
5.2. Applicability of research  57
5.2.1. For schools  57
5.2.2. For Youth, Students'' Union.  58
5.3. The difficulties, limitations in the work of belief-oriented students  58
5.4. Development topics  59
REFERENCES  61
APPENDIX QUESTIONAIRE  63


1.Goerge Ritzer, Contemparory Sociological Theory, Third Edition, University of Maryland.
2.Allport.G.W, Vernon.P.E, Lindzey.G (1960), A study of Value, Boston.
3.Brislin.R (1993), Understanding culture’s influence on behavior. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
4.Charles.S.Johnson (1994), The Rokeach Value Survey: Underlying Structure and Multidimensional Scaling, The Journal of Psychology, p.583-595.
5.Gordon Bennett (1979), The Revolutionary, Modern and Traditional Value of new social Groups in China, Value change in Chinese society, New York.
6.Greenblatt.L (1979), Individual Values and Attitudes in Chinese society: An Ethonomethodological approach, Value change in Chinese Society, New York.
7.John J.Macionis, Society -The basics, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632.
8.Kahle L.R (1983), Social value and social change: Adaptation to life in America, New York: Praeger.
9.Marja J.Nolusis (1993), SPSS for Windows, Base system Use’s Guide, SPSS Inc.
10.Markus. H.R, Kitayama.S (1991), Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation, Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
11.Matsumoto. D (1996), Culture and Psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
12.Module on the value clarification approach in the teaching of Population Education (1985), Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports, Manila, Philippines.
13.Nock,. L Steven. (1992). Sociology of Family. Prentice Hall, Engle Wood Cliffs, New Jersey.
14.Okura-sho Insatsu-kyoku.(1994) Japanese Youth in Comparison with the Youth of the World: The Report of the Fifth Survey on the Consciousness of the Youth of the World,  Tokyo
15.Podhisita, C., Pattaravanich.U (1995). Youth in Contemporary Thailand Results from the Family and Youth Survey.  IPSR Publication No.197. Nakhon Pathom : Institute for Population and Social Research.
16.Robin.M, Williams.J.R (1980), The concept of value, International Encyclopedia of the social sciences, v.15,16, 17.
17.Rokeach.M (1973), The nature of human value, New York, The Free Press.
18.Schwartz.S (1990), Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements, Journal of Cross-Cutural Psychology, 21, 139, 157.
19.Schwartz.S (1992), Universal in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries”, in M.Zanna (ed). Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 25. New York, p.01-65.
20.Tabachnick, B and Linda S. FiDell (1996), Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper Collins College Publishers.
21.Wang Lu, Xie Weihe (1996), Values of Chinese Youth, Chinese Youth. By the All-China Youth Federation and UNESCO, p.55-67.



 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關論文
 
無相關期刊
 
無相關點閱論文
 
* *