• 藍色版面
  • 綠色版面
  • 橘色版面
  • 粉紅色版面
  • 棕色版面
帳號:guest(120.119.126.29)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

研究生: 林鈺玫
研究生(外文): Yu-Mei Lin
論文名稱: 國民中學不分類巡迴輔導教師工作滿意度之研究
論文名稱(外文): The study of job satisfaction for cross-categorical itinerant teachers in the junior high school
指導教授: 黃文樹
指導教授(外文): Wen-Shu Huang
學位類別: 碩士
校院名稱: 樹德科技大學
系所名稱: 幼兒保育系
論文出版年: 99
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 133
中文關鍵詞: 不分類巡迴輔導教師工作滿意度國民中學
外文關鍵詞: cross-categorical itinerant teachersjob satisfactionjunior high school
相關次數:
  • 被引用:0
  • 點閱:48
  • 評分:*****
  • 下載:0
  • 書目收藏:0
本研究旨在探討國民中學不分類巡迴輔導教師工作滿意度,及其在不同背景
變項上的差異情形。
本研究採普查方式,對台灣地區國民中學不分類巡迴輔導教師之工作滿意,
進行調查研究。研究工具為「國民中學不分類巡迴輔導教師工作滿意度調查問卷」,共寄出72 份,回收有效問卷72 份。所得之資料以次數分配、百分比、標準差、平均數等統計方法進行處理。
綜合本研究結果如下:
一、國中不分類巡迴輔導教師在整體及工作滿意各層面,皆偏向滿意的感受。
二、工作滿意度之各層面由高而低,依次為人際關係、教學工作、進修情形、行政支持、教學環境、薪資福利及工作環境。
三、國中不分類巡迴輔導教師工作最滿意的事項是學生在學習過程有明顯的進步、成長,讓老師在教學上獲得成就感。最不滿意的事項是輔導區域分散,交通往返時間過長,缺乏交通意外險的保障。
四、國中不分類巡迴輔導教師繼續任教的原因是學生有進步、成長與回饋。導致不願繼續任教的因素是巡輔教師在教學工作上得不到學校行政人員、普通班教師及家長的認同與肯定,缺乏成就感。
五、國中不分類巡迴輔導教師對增進工作滿意度的看法包括提高交通補助或特教津貼、訂定相關管理辦法、替巡輔教師投保交通意外險、學校行政人員的支持與配合、開設相關專業研習。
關鍵字:不分類巡迴輔導教師、工作滿意度、國民中學

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the job satisfaction for the teachers of cross-categorical itinerant at junior high school in Taiwan and to examine
the effects of different background variables on their job satisfaction.
A survey on job satisfaction for cross-categorical itinerant teachers in the junior
high school in Taiwan was conducted by a “Job Satisfaction Questionnaire on cross-categorical itinerant teachers in the junior high school”, through a general investigation. 72 copies of Questionnaires were sent out, and 72 copies were filled in and available. The data collected was analyzed by frequence distribution, percentage, mean, and stand deviation.
The finding are summarized as follows:
1.Overall, cross-categorical itinerant teachers in junior high school were satisfied with their job.
2.The satisfaction order from the highest to the lowest was as follow: personal relationship, teaching profession, further education possibilities, administration support, teaching environmemt, salary and welfare and working environmemt.
3.The most satisfactory item is the student has the obvious progress, the growth in the learning process, lets teacher obtain the sense of achievement in the teaching. Not
the most satisfactory item is counsels the region to be scattered, the transportation round-trip time is excessively long, lacks the transportation accident insurance the safeguard.
4. Continues to teach is the student has the progress, the growth and the back coupling. Causes the factor which is not willing to continue to teach is patrols the auxiliary teacher in the teaching profession not to be able to obtain the school administrative personnel, the general education teachers and guardian's approval and the affirmation, lacks the sense of achievement.
5. To promotes the work degree of satisfaction the view including to enhance the transportation subsidy or to teach the allowance, to schedule the related policing method, for to patrol the auxiliary teacher to take out insurance the transportation accident insurance, the administrative personnel's support and the coordination, the start related specialized thorough study especially.

Keywords: cross-categorical itinerant teachers, job satisfaction, junior high school

程圖                                                  59

究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
黃毅志(2003)。「台灣地區新職業聲望與社會地位量表」之建構與評估:社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊,49(4),1-31。
曾恆靜(2008)。學前巡迴輔導特殊教育教師工作滿意度之研究。國立台北教育大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
彰化縣教育局(2005)。彰化縣國民教育階段身心障礙學生巡迴輔導實施計劃。
廖永堃、魏兆廷(2004)。花蓮縣巡迴式資源班經營現況探討。東台灣特殊教育學報,6,65-88。
劉宏隆(2004)。台北縣國民小學身心障礙資源班教師工作滿意度調查研究。國立臺東大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東市。
蔡璧煌(1989)。國民中小學教師壓力之研究。師大學報,34,75-114。
鄭媛文(2005)。桃園縣國小資源班教師工作壓力與工作滿意度相關之研究。中原大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
鄭靜瑩、趙敏弘(2004)。從視障學生的安置談融合教育的施行──以視障巡迴輔導為例。特教園丁,19(4),23-28。
蔣興傑(2002)。身心障礙學生接受「在家自行教育」之現況與檢討。特殊教育研究學刊,11,63-87。
蔡瑞美(2000b)。回歸主流高中職身心障礙學生巡迴輔導制度的實施現況。特殊教育季刊,75,1-6。
賴怡君(2006)。國小不分類巡迴輔導教師服務現況,期待及滿意度調查研究。國立花蓮教育大學身心障礙與輔助科技研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
賴明莉(2002)。國小身心障礙資源班教師工作滿意之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
蕭玉滿(2003)。國小啟智班教師專業承諾、工作滿意與專業角色踐行關係之研究。台中市師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
謝金青(1992)。國民小學行政兼職教師角色衝突與工作滿意之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所之博士論文,未出版,台北市。
謝佳銘(2007)。學前特教巡迴輔導教師工作滿意度研究。國立台中教育大學殊教育學系碩士專班碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
羅燕琴(2003)。花蓮縣特殊教育之現況與發展。特教通訊,29,1-4。
蘇素鸞、黃國隆(1992)。中學教師對教師工會與霸教的態度。教育心理與研究,15,173-214。

二、英文部份
Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understand of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
Alderfer, C. P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth. New York: Free Press.
Baron, R. A. (1983). Behavior in organizations : Understanding and managing the human side of work. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
Cooley, E., & Yovanoff, P. (1996). Supporting professionals at rist: Evaluating interventions to educators. Exceptional Children, 62(4), 336-355.
Correa-Torres, S. M., & Howell, J. J. (2004).Facing the challenges of itinerant teaching: Perspectives and suggestions fromthe field. Journal of Visual Impairment&
Blindness, 98(7), 420-433.
Dessler, G. (1976) .Personnel management : Modern concepts and techniques. Virginia: Reston Publishing Company,Inc.
Daly, C., & Edwards, A. (2001). The road more traveled: A narrative look at the working conditions of itinerant physical education specialists in Queensland state
primary schools. Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 34(1), 65-74.
Hoppock, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction. New York : Harper and Brothers.
Herzberg, F. (1959). The motivation to work. New York : Holy Wiley & Sons.
Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. New York : World Publishing Co.
Kluwin, T. N., Morris, C. S., & Clifford, J. (2004). A rapid ethnography of itinerant teachers of the deaf. American Annals of the Deaf, 149(1), 62-72。
Locke, E. A. (1976). Satisfactions and dissatisfactions among white and blue-collar employee. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 159-167.
Luckner, J. L., & Miller, K. J. (1993). Itinerant teachers: Responsibilities, perceptions, preparation, and students served. American annals of the Deaf, 139(2), 111-118.
Luckner, J. L., & Howell, J. (2002). Suggestions for preparing itinerant teachers: a qualitative analysis. American annals of the Deaf, 147(3), 54-61.
Olmstead, J. E. (1991). Itinerant teaching: Tricks of the trade for teachers of blind and visually unpaired students. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
Olmstead, J. E. (1995). Itinerant personnel: Asurvey of caseloads and working conditions. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89(6), 546-548.
Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. F. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Reed, S. (2003). Beliefs and practices of itinerant teachers of deaf and hard of hearing children concerning literacy development. American annals of the Deaf, 148(4),
333-343.
Robbins, S. P. (2001).Essentials of Organizational Behavior.
London: Prentice.
Schermerhorn, J. R., & Osborn, R. N. (1996). Organizational behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Strumwasser, K. P. (1988). The itinerant model for educating visually handicapped children: teacher perceptions of roles, administrative support, and competencies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University Teachers College, Columbia.
Vroom, V. H. (1964) . Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley & sons.
Wernimont, P. F. (1972). A system view of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 173-176.
Yarger, C. C., & Luckner, J. L. (1999). Itinerant teacher: The inside story. American annals of the Deaf, 144(4), 309-314.

 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊
 
* *