• 藍色版面
  • 綠色版面
  • 橘色版面
  • 粉紅色版面
  • 棕色版面
帳號:guest(120.119.126.29)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

研究生: 許凱鈞
研究生(外文): Hsu  Kai  Chun
論文名稱: 同儕性教育方案實施成效之研究─以高雄縣某科技大學為例
論文名稱(外文): The Effects of Peer Education Program─ A Case Study of University in Kaohsiung County
指導教授: 林燕卿
指導教授(外文): Lin Yen Chin
學位類別: 碩士
校院名稱: 樹德科技大學
系所名稱: 人類性學研究所
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 93
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 133
中文關鍵詞: 同儕性教育性知識性教育的態度性教育自我效能
外文關鍵詞: peer educatorssexual knowledgesexual education attitudesexual education self-efficacy
相關次數:
  • 被引用:5
  • 點閱:38
  • 評分:*****
  • 下載:0
  • 書目收藏:0
本研究旨在探討實施同儕性教育方案之成效,分析實施同儕性教育之困境與解決方法,為考驗實施同儕性教育之成效,採靜態組比較設計,以南區某科技大學之性教育種子隊社團為實驗組,另以春暉社為對照組。實驗組接受為期六週的同儕性教育方案教學,對照組則否。實施同儕性教育方案後,實驗組和對照組分別接受後測,所得資料以t考驗進行統計分析,以了解實施「同儕性教育方案」的成效是否顯著。此外,為了解學生對「同儕性教育」的相關態度,對實驗組學生進行焦點團體訪談。
          根據量化及質性資料分析,得到以下結論:
          一、實施同儕性教育方案後,實驗組在「性知識」、「性教育的態
          度」、「性教育自我效能」、「性教育溝通行為」部分之得分,均
          顯著高於對照組。
          二、實驗組學生對同儕性教育方案,均持正面同意的態度。
          三、實施同儕性教育,所遭遇最大的困境是傳統的道德規範所帶來的壓
          力,致使學生難以啟齒討論有關性議題;其次是時間不足,因此無
          法將課程設計融入各領域教學。
The main purpose of this study was to focus on the effects of Peer Sexual Education Program , and analysis of the difficulties and resolutions of Peer Sexual education. The method of the static-group comparison design research , questionnaire, and interview were used in this study.
          In order to examine the effects of this proposal, this study used the static-group comparison design. Both the experimental group and the control group were chosen from university in Kaohsiung County. The experimental group was from Sex-Seed club, the control group was from Sunlight club. The experimental group received the Peer Sexual Education Program for six weeks; however, the control group didn’t. All students received the posttest with Peer Sexual Education Test. The data were analyzed by t-test. Last, peer educators and students were chosen to have an interview with the researcher.
          On the basis of quantitative and qualitative analysis, the conclusions were made as follows:
          1. After the practice of the Proposal for Peer Sexual
            Education Program, the students from experimental group
            scored higher than those from control group on sexual
            knowledge、sexual education attitude、sexual education self-
            efficacy and sexual education communication behavior of the
            Peer Education Program Test.
          2. Students from experimental group had a positive attitude
            toward peer education proposal and related attitudes.
          3. Educators all supported and had definite attitude toward
            the proposal.
          4. Traditional norm pressure is the main problem for peer
            education, it makes students shy to talk about sex.
            Besides, educators didn’t have enough time to prepare.
            Moreover, due to the lack of teaching period, educators
            failed to prepare for sexual education, which was the extra-
          curriculum at schools.
目    錄
          第一章  緒論 1
              第一節  研究動機與重要性 1
              第二節  研究目的 3
              第三節  研究問題 3
              第四節  研究假設 4
              第五節  名詞界定 5
              第六節  研究方法與步驟 7
              第七節  研究範圍與限制 10
          第二章  文獻探討 12
              第一節  同儕教育意涵 12
              第二節  同儕教育相關理論運用 18
              第三節  同儕教育相關研究 36
          第三章  研究方法 44
              第一節  研究架構 44
              第二節  研究樣本 45
              第三節  同儕性教育教學活動設計 46
              第四節  實施程序 48
              第五節  研究工具 50
              第六節  資料分析 52
          第四章  研究結果與討論 53
              第一節  研究對象之背景資料 53
              第二節  同儕性教育方案介入效果 59
              第三節  訪談資料之分析 65
              第四節  實施同儕性教育方案成效之綜合討論 81
          第五章  結論與建議 87
              第一節  結  論 87
              第二節  建  議91
          參考文獻 94
          附錄一  課程內容 105
          附錄二  問  卷 112
          表  次
          表2- 1 同儕之名詞定義彙整表 11
          表4- 1 研究對象的背景資料 55
          表4- 2 「性」的知識或訊息的來源 57
          表4- 3 實驗組、對照組後測平均數與標準差 58
          表4- 4 實驗組與對照組後測得分之差異情形 60
          表4- 5 實驗組與對照組後測得分之差異情形(續) 61
          圖  次
          圖1- 1 研究流程圖 8
          圖2- 1 效能預期與結果預期之區別 19
          圖3- 1 研究架構圖 43
一、中文部分:
木村敦(民90)。對不同關係對象的利他行為與利他動機-台灣與日本之比較。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文。
台灣省家庭計畫研究所(民84)。台灣地區高中、高職及五專在校男女學生性知識、態度與行為現況及變遷。
朱娟瑩(民75)。我國大學生求助態度與求助行為之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
何嘉雯(民86年)。台北縣市大學生親子關係、婚姻態度對婚前性行為影響之研究。私立中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所碩士論文。
吳秉恩(民80)。組織行為學。台北:華泰。
吳清山(民80)。學校行政。台北:心理。
李國祿(民79)。家庭生活型態、傳播行為、同儕團體與兒童消費行為關係之研究。私立中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
沈慶鴻(民89)。由大學生兩性交往的現況談大學性教育的必要性。學生輔導,69,28-35
林生傳(民83)。教育心理學。台北:五南。
林惠生、林淑慧(民85)。台灣地區高中、高職及五專在男女學生性知識、態度與行為現況及變遷。台北第四屆亞洲性學會議口頭發表。
林翠湄譯,蘇建文校閱,Shaffer D. R.著(民84)。社會與人格發展。台北:心理出版社。
林燕卿(民89)。同儕性教育計畫效果研究。台北:師大書苑。
侯靜里(民90)。台北地區大學生自我概念對愛情關係適應與婚前性行為影響之研究。私立中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所碩士論文。
洪冬桂(民75):我國大學生適應問題、因應行為、求助偏好及其相關因素之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
孫亦君、李蘭(民88)。以焦點團體法探討黃色笑話與色情影像產品於國一學生之暴露情形。台灣性學學刊,5(2),25-36
徐綺櫻(民82):父母管教態度與學齡兒童行為困擾之研究﹘以台北縣為例。私立東吳大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
晏涵文、林燕卿、張利中(民87)。青少年婚前性行為及其趨勢探討。台灣性學學刊,4(2),1-14。
馬藹屏(民76):家庭社經地位、父母教養方式與國中學生自我概念、友伴關係之調查研究。私立中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
張利中(民87)。大專學生於電子佈告欄(BBS)連線性學討論區所提性問題之研究。台灣性學學刊,4(2),36-49。
張春興(民80)。張氏心理辭典。台北:東華。
張春興(民83)。教育心理學。台北:東華。
張酒雄(民83)。學生的身心發展與特徵。教育心理學,林生傳主編。台北:五南。
郭國禎(民75)。我國大專學生求助需欲與求助態度之調查研究。輔導學報,9 ,165-203 。
陳奎喜(民79)。教育社會學研究。台北:師大書苑。
程玲玲(民76)。台灣大學生心理求助歷程之探討。中華心理衛生學刊,3(1),125-138 。
黃貴美(民81)。大學生性知識及態度之研究-家庭生活與性教育。私立中國文化大學。
黃意舒(民83)。幼稚園教師教學角色認同與實踐研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。
黃德祥(民83)。青少年發展與輔導。台北:五南出版社。
黃德祥(民89)。青少年的同儕關係與社會比較對人格發展的影響。青少年人格建構研討會論文集。財團法人人格建構工程學研究基金會。
楊佳羚(民91)。新世紀性教育師資培育工作坊紀要。兩性平等教育季刊,20,95-101。
楊金裡、晏涵文(民87)。某夜二專學生與性伴侶使用保險套情形及其相關因素之探討。台灣性學學刊,4(2),50-62。
楊益風(民90)。國民中小學教師在九年一貫課程改革中之角色衝突及其因應。國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
楊煥烘(民69)。我國大學生性知識、態度、行為之調查研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
葉昭幸(民87)。有性經驗之高職及大專學生是否使用保險套之相關因素。長庚護理,11(4),24-35。
葉祥溪(民82)。國民中學輔導主任角色之研究-角色期望與角色實踐之探討。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
董華欣(民82)。影響大學生尋求專業心理輔導意願之因素探討。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
雷庚玲、曾慧芸(民88)。誰說我不聽話,我聽朋友的話-談青少年社會同儕順從行為之發展現象與成因。測驗與輔導,153,3178-3182。
蔣東霖(民92)。依附、社會學習與少年偏差行為。南華大學教育社會學研究所碩士論文。
鄭丞傑(民92)。台灣地區墮胎數估算及婦產科醫師的角色澄清。性教育通訊6(4),3。
鄭家如、沈珠帆(民89)。台南師院初教系學生性知識與性態度之調查研究。台南師院學生學刊,17,13-27。
謝文全(民82)。教育行政﹘ 理論與實務。台北:文景。
鍾思嘉(民85)。青少年身心調適問題及其輔導對策。青少年問題與輔導論文輯,62-70 。台北:行政院青年輔導委員會。
韓經綸譯,Steers, R.M.著 (民83)。組織行為學專論。台北:五南。
顏裕峰(民81)。國中生的社會興趣與同儕人際關係之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文。
魏正元(民84)。以人員為核心的服務接觸之研究:互動模式的探索。中原大學企業管理學系。
疾病管制局(民93)。第七屆台北國際愛滋病研討會系列報導﹘拒絕青春與愛滋共舞〔線上資料〕。取自http://203.65.72.83/ ch/das/ ShowPublication.ASP?RecNo=3564
二、英文部分:
Altmann HA, Nysetvold I, Downe AG.(1986). Evaluation of peer counseling in the elementary school. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 29(2), 85-90.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 14, 191-215.
Bandura A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
Bandura A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 33, 344-358.
Bandura A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Pretice Hall,Inc.
Bandura A. (1989). Social learning theory. Annuals of Child Development, 6, 1-60.
Bandura, A. (1989a). Regulation of Cognitive Processes Through Perceived Self-Efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 729-35.
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self- regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 248-287.
Bar-Tal, D. (1976). Prosocial Behavior: Theory and research. NY: John
Wiley.
Bar-Tal, D. (1982). Sequential development of helping behavior: A Cognitive learning approach. Developmental Review, 2, 101-124.
Bonnell K. & Caillouet L.(1991). Communication Patterns and Barriers between Teenagers and Parents about Sex-Related Topics:A Survey of Teenagers in Sex Education Classes.
British Youth Council (1998a). Peer Education Survey: initial  results of BYC''s survey of peer education projects. London: British Youth Council.
British Youth Council (1998b). Youth Agenda: peer education. Discussion Paper 3. London: British Youth Council.
Brock L. & Jennings G.(1993). Sexuality education :What daughters in their 30s with their mothers had told them. Family Relation, 42, 61-65.
Carr, S., Thomas, P., Doyle, D., Redman, J. & Myles, A. (1994). The Start of the Peer Show. Young People Now, July, 32-34.
Dawson, D.(1986). The effect of education on adolescent behavior. Family planning perspective, 18, 162-170.
Dayton, M. (1987). Peer programmes in prevention. Drug Education Journal of Australia, 1, 2.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex difference in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ:Erbaum.
Estcourt CS, Marks C, Rohrsheim R.(2000).HIV, sexually transmitted infections, and risk behaviours in male commercial sex workers in Sydney. Sex Transm Infect, 76, 294-98.
Finn P.(1981). Teaching students to be lifelong peer educators. Health Education, 12(5), 13-16.
Gordon, S. (1973) The sexual adolescent: Communication with teenagers about sex. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
Gould JM, Lomax AR, eds.(1993) Professionals'' experiences of peer education-Four experts speak. J Am Coll Health, 41.
Haignere, Clara S., Freudenberg, Nicholas, Silver, Diana R., Maslanka, Halina, Kelley, Janet T.(1997). One method for assessing HIV/AIDS peer-education programs. Journal of Adolescent Health, 21, 76-79.
Harris, I(1959). Normal children and mothers. New York:Free Press.
Hinson, J. A., & Swanson, J.L. (1993). Willingness to seek help
as a function of self- disclosure and problem severity.
Journal of Counseling and Development, 71(4), 465-470.
Inman, M. (1974)  What teenagers want in sex education. American Journal of Nursing, 74, 1866-1867.
Judy Orme(1999). Senior Lecturer in Health Promotion at the University of the West of England, Faculty of Health and Social Care, Bristol, UK. Health Education.Bradford, 99, 1, 8.
Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Quinn, R.P., Snoek, J.D., & Rosenthal, R.A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. N. Y.: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Latane & Darley.(1970). The unresponsive bystander : Why doesn’t he help ? New York : Appleton-Gentury-Croft.
Lent, R. W. & Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy:Empirical status and future directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 347-382
Lewis, P. V. (1975).  Organizational Communications: The Essence of Effective Management. Columbus, OH: Grid.
Macri, I., Tsiantis,J.(1998). Effects of a peer led intervention program on smoking prevention: A case example in Greece. Quarterly of Community Health Education. 17(3), 297-308.
Mary A. Ott, Nancy L. Evans, Bonnie L. Halpern-Felsher, & Stephen L.Eyre.(2003).Differences in altruistic roles and HIV risk perception among staff, peer educators, and students in an adolescent peer education program. AIDS Education and Prevention, 15(2),159-171.
Matthews & Associates (2002). Sexual health resources. Cheryl D Fields. Black Issues in Higher Education, 18(25), 24.
Medical Letter on the CDC & FDA(2003). HIV/AIDS Public Health; Peer education for HIV prevention in Vietnam needs to be expanded Atlanta: 20.
Milburn, K. (1995). A critical review of peer education with young people with special reference to sexual health. Health and Education Research, 10, 407-420.
Miller, W. & MacGilchrist, L. (1996). A model for peer-led work. Health Education, 2, March, 24-29.
Morris, Robert E., Baker, Charles, Anderson, Jace, Valentine, Maureen.(1996). A comparison of peer, adult and mixed (adult and peer) HIV prevention educators for probationary youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 18, 146-152.
Nadler, A. (1983). Help seeking and receiving. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Montreal, Quebec.
Noonan JC.(1993). The health behaviors of peer educators at The Pennsylvania State University. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, Thesis.
Olson C., Woroby J. (1984). Perceived mother-daughter relations in a pregnant and nonpregnant adolescent sample. Adolescent, 19(76), 781-794.
Palan, K. M.(1998). Relationships between family communication and consumer activities of adolescent: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing science, 26 (4), 338-349.
Patrick J. McEwan(2003). Peer effects on student achievement: evidence from Chile. Economics of Education Review, 22, 131-141.
Pearlman, Deborah N., Camberg, Lois, Wallace, Laurie Jo, Symons, Paul, Finison, Lorenz(2002). Tapping youth as agents for change: evaluation of a peer leadership HIV/AIDS intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 31-39.
Phillips D.A., Zimmerman M.(1990). The developmental course of perceived competence and incompetence among competent children.In R.J. Sternberg & Kolligian, Competence considered , 41-66. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
Rice F. P.(1993). Adolescent development, relationships, and culture. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Robbins, S. P. (1991). Organizational behavior, 5 . Ed. N.J.:Prentice Hall.
Robeca L. Ramos and Joas B. Freeeira-Pinto.(2002).A Model for Capacity-Building in AIDS Prevention Program. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14(3), 196-206.
Walker S.A. & Avis M. (1999). Common reasons why peer education fails. Journal of Adolescent Health, 22, 573-577.
Strecher V.J., Rosenstock I. M. (1997) The Health Belief Model. Health behavior and health education :Theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco,CA.
Schiamberg, L. B.(1988). Child and adolescent development. NewYork: Macmillan.
Schmidt, M. (2000). Role theory, emotions, and identity in the department headship of secondary schooling. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 827-842.
Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1984). A Normative Decision-Making Model of Altruism. IN J. P. Rushton,.& R. M. Sorrentino. Altruism and Helping Behavior Social, Personality, and Development a Perspective.Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Shiner M. (1999) Defining peer education. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 555-566.
Snyder, J. F., Hill, C. E. & Derksen, T.P. (1972). Why some students do not use university counseling facilities.
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(4), 263-268.
Shiner, M. & Newburn, T. (1996). Young People, Drugs and Peer Education: an evaluation of the Youth Awareness Programme. London: Home Office.
Tinsley H. E. A., Aubin T.M., Brown M. T. (1982). College students’help-seeking preferences. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29(5), 523-533.
Tobler, N. (1986). Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison group. The Journal of Drug Issues, 16, 537-567.
Tobler, N. (1992). Drug prevention programs can work: research findings. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 11(3), 1-28.
Van Sell, M.V., Brief, A.P., & Schuler, R.S. (1981). Role conflict and role ambiguity: Integration of the literature and directions for future research . Human Relations, 34 (1), 43-71.
Ward, J., Hunter, G. & Power, R. (1997). Peer education as a means of drug prevention and education among young people: an evaluation. Health Education Journal.
Ziersch A, Gaffney J, Tomlinson DR.(2000). STI prevention and the male sex industry in London: evaluating a pilot peer education programme. Sex Transm Infect, 76, 447-53.
Zunyou Wu, Roger Detels, Guoping Ji, Chen Xu, Keming Rou, Huancheng Ding, and Virginia Li(2002). Diffusion of HIV/AIDS Knowledge, Positive Attitude, and Behaviors Through Training of Health Professionals in China.AIDS Education and Prevention, 14(5), 379-390.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *