• 藍色版面
  • 綠色版面
  • 橘色版面
  • 粉紅色版面
  • 棕色版面
  • 棕色版面
guest(120.119.126.29) 新年快樂!臺北時間:2012/02/01 14:28          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

本論文引用網址:     
研究生: 陳泰和
研究生(外文): Hoa Tran Thai
論文名稱(外文): A Study on Relationship among Job Autonomy, Supervisor Support, Task Interdependence, Intrinsic Motivation and Critical Reflective Working Behavior
指導教授: 唐國銘
學位類別: 碩士
校院名稱: 樹德科技大學
系所名稱: 資訊管理系碩士班
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 76
外文關鍵詞: Motivation (psychology)Job satisfactionEmployee attitudesWorkplace learningCritically reflective working behaviorVietnam
相關次數:
  • 被引用:0
  • 點閱:22
  • 評分:*****
  • 下載:0
  • 書目收藏:0
The purpose of this study is to test the relationship between intrinsic motivation and critically reflective working behavior, particularly critical opinion-sharing dimension among individuals from a broad cross-section of job types among public employees with the objectives of contributing to self-determination theory and assisting public management practice and research. To obtain these purposes, the self- determination theory is considered as the basic one to propose the theoretical framework for this study. Therefore, in order to increase our knowledge of the quality of self-determination theory as a work motivation theory, an empirical study using self-administered survey questionnaire and statistical tools will be conducted to validate the proposed framework. The results demonstrates that three factors-job autonomy, supervisor support, job interdependence have positive impact critical reflective working behavior is mediated by intrinsic motivation. As a result, implications of the findings for managerial perspectives; and directions for future research are discussed.

Abstract  i
Acknowledgement  ii
Table of Contents  iii
List of Tables  v
List of Figures  vi
List of Abbreviation  vii
Chapter 1 Introduction………………………………………………………………1
  1.1 Background of study  1
  1.2 Aims and objectives of study  3
  1.3 Research questions of study  3
  1.4 Structure of study  3
Chapter 2 Literature Review  4
  2.1 Definitions of Working Motivation  4
  2.2 Types of motivations  9
  2.3 Critical reflection of working behavior  13
  2.3.1 Definition of critical reflection  13
  2.3.2 Dimensions of critical reflection working behavior  18
  2.4 Theoretical background  25
  2.4.1 Cognitive evaluation theory  25
  2.4.2 Self-determination theory  28
Chapter 3 Research Methodology  32
  3.1 Research framework and hypotheses  32
  3.2 Research hypotheses  33
  3.2.1 Antecedents of intrinsic motivation  33
  3.2.2 Intrinsic motivation and critical reflective of working behavior .………35
  3.3 Quantitative methodology  35
  3.4 Instrument development  36
  3.5 Data collection method  40
  3.6 Data analysis method  40
Chapter 4 Data Results and Discussion  42
  4.1 Data result…………………………………………………………………...42
  4.1.1Demographics statistic  42  4.1.2 Factor analysis  43
  4.1.3 Correlation Coefficient  47
  4.1.4 One-way ANOVA analysis  47
  4.1.5 Hypotheses testing  48
  4.2 Findings and Discussion  51
Chapter 5 Conclusions...…………………………………………………………….54
  5.1 Conclusion of study  54
  5.2 Contributions of study  55
  5.3 Managerial Implications  57
  5.4 Research limitations  59
  5.5 Direction for future research  59
References…………………………………………………………………………...61
Appendix A………………………………………………………………………….69


[1]Abraham K. K. (1970), “Toward an hypothesis of work behavior”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 54, No. 1,pp. 31-41.
[2]Argyris, Ch., Schön, D.A. (1996), Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method and Practice, Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA..
[3]Arthur, J.B. (1994), “Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 670-87.
[4]Bachrach, D.G., Powell, B.C., Bendoly, E. and Richey, R.G. (2006), “Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: exploring the impact of task interdependence”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91 No. 1, pp. 193-201.
[5]Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Though and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[6]Bandura, A. (1997), Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Freeman, New York, NY.
[7]Baron, R. and Kenny, D. (1986), “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51 No. 6, pp. 1173-82.
[8]Blascovich, J., Mendes, W.B., Hunter, S.B. and Salomon, K. (1999), “Social facilitation as challenge and threat”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 77 No. 1, pp. 68-77.
[9]Brockner, J., Tyler, T.R. and Cooper-Schneider, R. (1992), “The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions to perceived fairness: the higher they are, the harder they fall”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, pp. 241-61.
[10]Brookfield, S.D. (1987), Developing Critical Thinkers, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
[11]Brooks, A.K. (1999), "Critical reflection as a response to organizational disruption" for predicting role breadth and job performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 399-406.
[71]Noblet, A., Teo, S.T.T., McWilliams, J. and Rodwell, J.J. (2005), “Which work characteristics predict employee outcomes for the public sector employee? An examination of generic and occupation-specific characteristics”, International Journal Human Resource Management, Vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 1415-30.
[72]Organ, D.W. (1988), Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
[73]Osborne, J.W. and Costello, A.B. (2004), “Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal component analysis”, Practical Assessment, Research &]Ryan, R. and Deci, E. (2000), “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being”, American Psychologist, Vol. 55, pp. 68-78.
[86]Schön, D.A. (1987), Educating the Reflective Practitioner, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
[87]Senge, P.M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Doubleday, London.
[88]Sharma, A., Rich, G.A. and Levy, M. (2004), “Comment: Starting to solve the method puzzle in salesperson self-report evaluations”, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. XXIV, No. 2, pp. 135-9.
[89]Sheldon, K.M., Elliot, A.J., Kim, Y. and Kasser, T. (2001), “What is satisfying by satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 80, pp. 325-39.
[90]Thomas, K.W. (2002), Intrinsic Motivation at Work: Building Energy &human resource management research”, Journal of Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 247-76.
[101]Zajonc, R.B. (1980), “Compresence”, in Paulus, P.B. (Ed.), Psychology of Group Influence, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 35-60.


 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20120615)
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 top
* *